alt Hacker NewsBuilding to protect occupants and building to make the structure salvageable afterwards may be two different goals. Think crumple zones in cars.
Replies
earnestinger • yesterday at 11:29 AM
Nice point. Still, in wast majority of cases, house keeps standing -> habitant survival chance goes up.
Cars being on the move, makes that distinction much much more relevant
➕ show 1 reply
llm_trw • yesterday at 12:20 PM
Where is the crumple zone in the burned out buildings in California?
➕ show 1 reply
This is not a good analogy.
Crumple zones in cars exist under the assumption that they will not be occupied by humans. In a house, on the other hand, any place could have a person inside of it during an earthquake, meaning that basically the entire house would need to stand to avoid any human being hurt.