logoalt Hacker News

ZeroGravitas01/17/20253 repliesview on HN

Building to protect occupants and building to make the structure salvageable afterwards may be two different goals. Think crumple zones in cars.


Replies

Almondsetat01/17/2025

This is not a good analogy.

Crumple zones in cars exist under the assumption that they will not be occupied by humans. In a house, on the other hand, any place could have a person inside of it during an earthquake, meaning that basically the entire house would need to stand to avoid any human being hurt.

show 2 replies
earnestinger01/17/2025

Nice point. Still, in wast majority of cases, house keeps standing -> habitant survival chance goes up.

Cars being on the move, makes that distinction much much more relevant

show 1 reply
llm_trw01/17/2025

Where is the crumple zone in the burned out buildings in California?

show 1 reply