alt Hacker News> Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.
It does, because the Supreme Court's ruling is the legally binding interpretation.
The EFF are just some people with an non-legally binding opinions.
> Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.
It does, because the Supreme Court's ruling is the legally binding interpretation.
The EFF are just some people with an non-legally binding opinions.
It boggles the mind that this comment is being downvoted for literally stating facts. People really have their fingers in their ears with this topic.