logoalt Hacker News

JumpCrisscross01/22/20251 replyview on HN

> It's similar in scale to the GDP of a small middle income country

I’ve been advocating for a data centre analogue to the Heavy Press Programme for some years [1].

This isn’t quite it. But when I mapped out costs, $1tn over 10 years was very doable. (A lot of it would go to power generation and data transmission infrastructure.)

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_Press_Program


Replies

ethbr101/22/2025

One-time capital costs that unlock a range of possibilities also tend to be good bets.

The Flood Control Act [0], TVA, Heavy Press, etc.

They all created generally useful infrastructure, that would be used for a variety of purposes over the subsequent decades.

The federal government creating data center capacity, at scale, with electrical, water, and network hookups, feels very similar. Or semiconductor manufacture. Or recapitalizing US shipyards.

It might be AI today, something else tomorrow. But there will always be a something else.

Honestly, the biggest missed opportunity was supporting the Blount Island nuclear reactor mass production facility [1]. That was a perfect opportunity for government investment to smooth out market demand spikes. Mass deployed US nuclear in 1980 would have been a game changer.

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood_Control_Act_of_1928

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offshore_Power_Systems#Const...

show 1 reply