logoalt Hacker News

UncleOxidant01/22/20254 repliesview on HN

Then why would they drop the charge if they thought the evidence pointed to the fact he did it.


Replies

tzs01/22/2025

Separate courts. He was indicted and tried for all the non-murder stuff in a New York federal court. He was indicted separately in a Maryland federal court on a murder-for-hire charge.

The New York court convicted him, and then considered the murder-for-hire allegations when determining his sentence. They found them true by a preponderance of the evidence and and that was a factor in his sentence to life without parole. He appealed, and the Second Circuit upheld the sentence.

The prosecutors in Maryland then dropped the murder-for-hire charge because there was no point. They said this would allow them to direct their resources to other other cases where justice had not yet been served.

show 4 replies
cjbgkagh01/22/2025

'preponderance' is the clue, criminal is 'beyond all reasonable doubt', civil is preponderance. Ross was being charged under criminal law.

show 1 reply
mmooss01/22/2025

Possibly because he was already facing a long sentence and it wasn't worth pursuing that charge.

rsanek01/22/2025

this would be a criminal charge preponderance of the evidence wouldn't be enough to convict

show 1 reply