Ironic how this comment exemplifies the issue - broad claims about "slop" output but no specific examples or engagement with current architectures. Real discussions here usually reference benchmarks or implementation details.
(from Claude)
Excellent example. This comment contains nothing novel, substantive, or interesting.
I'm sorry I didn't meet the LLMs expectations, but whether something is subjectively entertaining or not can't be exemplified by objective benchmarks.
You're sort of ignoring the issue? If the generated content was good and interesting enough on it's own, we would already have ai publishing houses pushing out entire trilogies, and each of those would be top sellers.
Generative content right now is OK. OK isn't really the goal, or what anyone wants.