logoalt Hacker News

BoiledCabbage01/22/20252 repliesview on HN

Seriously, that was pretty blatant "he was one of the good guys like me and so the law shouldn't really punish him, not like one of those other people with different value that should be punished to the full extent."


Replies

pmarreck01/22/2025

Not at all. My point was actually:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42792552

miningape01/22/2025

I mean there's a legal concept of motivation. A murder is sentenced very differently if it's premeditated, or not.

The idea of looking at someone's motivations to determine their sentencing is critical to our legal system - otherwise important defences like the "Battered Wife Defence" wouldn't work.

I think most of us can also see a difference between a poor person stealing some gloves to stay warm in the winter and a rich person stealing those same gloves for the thrill. The only difference here is you don't like the fact that Ulbricht's motivations were more high minded than your average crack pusher (cough CIA cough) - the judge didn't either - in fact he sentenced him harder for it to make an example of him.

show 1 reply