Doesn't "dismissed with prejudice" usually mean something like "the evidence presented for the charge is so lacking that the charge should never have been brought in the first place"?
see my edit. i am a full supporter of letting adults have freedom to buy and use whatever drugs they want but i also think murdering and torturing people should not be allowed
Not a lawyer but I believe that “with prejudice” means that the judge denies appeals (so yes generally it means the case is considered frivolous)