alt Hacker News60hz is really taking the piss at this point, if they must reserve 120hz for the Pro line then the least they could do is use 90hz further down the stack.
Replies
throitallaway • 02/19/2025
Apple is the king us using old kit and marketing it as innovative. On the flip side, 26 hours of video playback on battery is crazy long, and 60Hz is a big contributor to that.
➕ show 1 reply
jayrot • 02/19/2025
The obvious problem with that is that 90hz is just as good as 120hz for 95% of people. (60hz is as good as 90hz for probably 70%)
➕ show 1 reply
layer8 • 02/19/2025
According to several supply-chain rumors, the iPhone 17 models will all have 120 Hz.
bigstrat2003 • 02/19/2025
60hz refresh is totally fine, there's no reason to be salty about it.
➕ show 1 reply
I have a Pro that I've set to only use 60 FPS (Accessibility / Motion / Limit Frame Rate). 120 FPS is ever so slightly smoother, but I would rather have the slightly better battery life disabling it.
Among mainstream users, people just don't care and this isn't remotely the differentiator people seem to hold it as. Similar to the micro bezel fetish, these are spec-chaser points that certain manufacturers convince people are must haves. But they really aren't.