logoalt Hacker News

xbmcuserlast Wednesday at 5:49 PM2 repliesview on HN

Similar stuff is being done for material sciences where AI suggest different combinations to find different properties. So when people say AI(machine learning, LLM) are just for show I am a bit shocked as AI's today have accelerated discoveries in many different fields of science and this is just the start. Anna archive probably will play a huge role in this as no human or even a group of humans will have all the knowledge of so many fields that an Ai will have.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/super-diamond-b26...


Replies

fhd2last Wednesday at 6:17 PM

It's a matter of perspective and expectations.

The automobile was a useful invention. I don't know if back then there was a lot of hype around how it can do anything a horse can do, but better. People might have complained about how it can't come to you when called, can't traverse stairs, or whatever.

It could do _one_ thing a horse could do better: Pull stuff on a straight surface. Doing just one thing better is evidently valuable.

I think AI is valuable from that perspective, you provide a good example there. I might well be disappointed if I would expect it to be better than humans at anything humans can do. It doesn't have to. But with wording like "co-scientist", I see where that comes from.

show 2 replies
bjarlssonlast Wednesday at 6:23 PM

What does this cited article have to do with AI? Unless I’m missing something the researchers devised a novel method to create a material that was known since 1967.