alt Hacker NewsThis is a non sequitur. The original comment referred to the $116M HP paid to acquire the assets. None of that was paid to employees.
Yes, Humane burned through $200M of investor capital, and some of it was spent on salaries for employees. The employees likely accepted lower cash salaries than were otherwise competitive, in exchange for equity which is now worthless. What is your point exactly?
Are you suggesting the employees pulled a fast one somehow because the investors paid their salaries? That’s, obviously, how venture-backed startups work, and everyone involved (especially the investors) is very aware of the trade. In exchange, the investors own much more of the company than the employees and have a much higher upside potential if the company succeeds.
Replies
You can get hired at some startups but don't actually have to work very hard because you are friend with the founders, etc. So you become for example Executive Assistant, or some minor roles that have almost no reporting needed. It's more common than it seems.
Of course if you are externally hired engineer it could be that you really have to do hard work, but, again, it depends.
Honest question: isn't that really how 99.9999% of all startups are? Wouldn't those who chose to work at Humane realize the moon-shoot risks of working there? I have eschewed working at VC-backed startups for this very reason; if they're not self-sustaining they're a no-go for me. I don't play the lottery either; but, there are plenty of people who do for a 1 in a 400B chance at winning.