logoalt Hacker News

cptskippylast Wednesday at 7:15 PM2 repliesview on HN

"Qi2 is based on Magsafe" is not the same as "Apple is... contributing to a new version of Qi"

Your statement implies that Qi2 used Magsafe as a starting point or that it's primarily based on Magsafe. Your statement is inaccurate and would lead people to think that Qi2 was mostly an Apple design.


Replies

Kirby64last Thursday at 5:41 PM

> Your statement implies that Qi2 used Magsafe as a starting point or that it's primarily based on Magsafe. Your statement is inaccurate and would lead people to think that Qi2 was mostly an Apple design.

You'd be wrong, though. Apple is on the WPC membership and has heavy influence over their spec definitions. They do this with many standards. They sit on the standards body as contributing members, and influence the specifications in ways they see as beneficial. They did this with USB (especially USB-C), they do this with MIPI standards, and they do this with WPC.

When standards organizations move too slow (which, is pretty much always), companies like Apple will move to make proprietary versions of a thing usually based on drafts of standards that are taking too long.

DrBenCarsonlast Wednesday at 10:19 PM

…it is. Qi2 is basically a copy-paste of MagSafe

show 2 replies