But every thing stated in the comment you linked is provably true. It's certainly concerning, but I can't see a single statement they made with a dubious basis in truth.
Are there any parts that you think violate the guidelines specifically?
The first sentence begins with "Trump lies through his teeth with every word"
Love him or hate him, I would argue that there are indeed words Trump has spoken which are not lies made through his teeth. I would put that level of hyperbole within the realm of "dubious basis in truth".
It doesn't matter if every part of it is factually true or not - it doesn't add anything to the discussion.