logoalt Hacker News

huijzer02/20/20253 repliesview on HN

In general from a formal logic perspective the whole idea of “an exception that proves the rule” is flawed. If the statement was “an exception that disproves the rule”, then I would agree.


Replies

OccamsMirror02/20/2025

"The exception that proves the rule" does not mean that an exception confirms a rule in a logical sense. Instead, it originates from legal and linguistic contexts where an explicit exception implies the existence of a general rule. E.g. a sign that says "No parking on Sundays" implies that the rule is that parking is fine on other days.

show 1 reply
throw31082202/20/2025

I always thought it meant "the exception (to the rule-of-thumb) proves the (hard, correct) rule".

show 1 reply
vasco02/20/2025

It's only flawed because you are also using it wrong!