logoalt Hacker News

tonyhart7last Thursday at 8:19 AM4 repliesview on HN

[flagged]


Replies

ZeroGravitaslast Thursday at 8:32 AM

Your comment is vague so it's not clear if you are accusing voters in general of uncrtitically accepting obvious propaganda or if you yourself have believed obvious propaganda generated by DOGE.

aredoxlast Thursday at 9:55 AM

Now that they can edit data, nothing can be proven, as they broke the chain of trust and accountability.

A criminal case can be thrown out if policemen didn't follow procedure, the same applies here. Those rules are put in place to protect all of us, and can't be handwaved because "that guy got elected" (with 49.8% of popular votes BTW).

cgcroblast Thursday at 8:42 AM

The distinction between whether or not someone is formally registered as dead and whether or if they receive money are two completely different things and should not be confused. If you conflate the two issues then you can only be being disingenuous.

I've worked at a company which had people who have been dead longer than America exists in their database and some of them do not have a recorded date of death. That does not mean they are not dead, just that the death was not confirmed. And no they weren't being paid.

However if you get some junior developer in with no real knowledge of what they are doing on the job, stuff like this will appear and you can use it for political collateral because no one cares enough to understand the problem and ask questions. Like yourself.

Mekolotolast Thursday at 9:26 AM

No 300 year old pensionier got a paycheck. There was an audit just a few years back which didn't find big/relevant issues.

The USA Gov is not completly brain dead.

And no 'people didn't vote for this'. 1. only about 60-70% of people voted and from them around 50% voted for Trump.

The question is still valid if this should allow the current gov to overhaul the whole system that agressivly.

A gov and the people depending on it, are not tech bros who can afford to get fired.

Musk/Trump is already responsible for real death alone through the way they cut USAID: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/climate-and-people...

There is a 'okayisch' way to stop everything (its the USA choice if the most powerful and richest country is no longer able or motivated to help around the globe despite the damage a country like the USA does around the globe, think co2, resources etc.) and there is the Musk/Trump way and no this is not okay at all. Its a breach of social contract, respect etc.