logoalt Hacker News

CyrsBel02/20/20253 repliesview on HN

So far they said 20% refunds, 20% against the debt, and the rest...presumably they are determining to what extent to put that into tax cuts and the other two buckets some more. This way everyone wins, assuming their savings so far are sustainable and annualized.


Replies

smallmancontrov02/20/2025

No, loudly broadcasting the heavy-handed implication that you have found $100B in fraud without having found $100B in fraud is still bad, even if the 1/1000th that they did find (I'm being generous here) is real and goes into tax cuts / debt.

Also, the capital gains taxes ARE low and the income taxes ARE high, so just paying down the debt isn't nearly so "even-handed" as it seems.

show 1 reply
pqtyw02/20/2025

> 20% against the debt

That seems insignificant when their other proposed policies are intended to massively increase that debt?

SmirkingRevenge02/20/2025

The rampage isn't going to save money on net, and even if it did, it would amount to a fart in a hurricane.

Like.. we could just personally tax Elon a little bit more while changing nothing else and recover more money, most likely.

Elimination (or indefinite pause) of the CFPB that was a trade of 21 billion in consumer savings for like 750 million in expenses.

If they wanted to improve efficiency, there's an easy place to start: the IRS. And you wouldn't start by firing, you'd start hiring lots and lots of people.