logoalt Hacker News

datadrivenangel04/02/20252 repliesview on HN

You don't exaggerate yields, you just publish the best one you get out of a dozen attempts. Chemistry is messy.


Replies

thyristan04/02/2025

That, in science, is called "lying".

Either you publish the range of results, the average plus standard deviation or average plus standard deviation of a subset with the exclusion criteria and exclusion range. Picking a result is a lie, plain and simple, and messiness is not an excuse.

show 2 replies
awjlogan04/02/2025

Compare the yields in a typical JACS (or any high end journal) paper versus those in OrgSyn and I think it's pretty clear that yields in many papers are more than exaggerated. It's a single untraceable number and the outcome of your PhD depends on it - the incentive is very clear. Leave a bit of DCM in, weigh, high vac to get rid of the singlet at 5.30ppm and no one's any the wiser...