A bit strange that you sidestep the video and transcript (which supports the debunking) because it doesn't fit your confirmation bias
The strange thing here is that you've chosen to defend the indefensible on the grounds of trying to "both sides" something that really is only from one side.
The strange thing here is that you've chosen to defend the indefensible on the grounds of trying to "both sides" something that really is only from one side.