logoalt Hacker News

ryzvonusef04/03/20252 repliesview on HN

I am not ignoring it, That disenfranchisement is deliberate, and NOT as a consequence of voter-ID.

Our government and population WANT to disenfranchise them, we WANT to be bigoted against them, and if photo-ID didn't exist, voter rolls STILL exist and then we would use THOSE to lynch them or whatever.


Replies

nemothekid04/03/2025

This is hilarious. When it's YOUR government trying to disenfranchise voters, it's deliberate and you can understand that.

When it's America, then it's somehow different. I even laid it out for you clearly that republicans WANT to disenfranchise them, but your prescription is that we need a 25 year plan to offer photo IDs on the cheap.

>and if photo-ID didn't exist, voter rolls STILL exist and then we would use THOSE to lynch them or whatever.

The irony in telling Americans to build a 25 year plan to roll out photo ID when they don't even solve issues for your government. Do you not see how foolish it is to tell Americans to spend time solving a problem that YOU KNOW won't solve the issue of government targeted disenfranchisement? You wrote 500 odd words telling Americans to build a system you just admitted doesn't work to solve the underlying problem.

show 1 reply
selimthegrim04/03/2025

You know they are on separate voting rolls (on paper) which they don’t validate.

show 1 reply