That is a very important point that I also was surprised wasn't mentioned. Google offers amazing APIs regarding locations and places, but they are expensive and prohibit you from storing it in any meaningful way.

I was surprised to see AWS' location service wasn't compared in this write-up. They are unique in that they offer both options. They ask when you provision the service if you plan on storing the data. The service works the same, but the cost is 8x. A fair trade, if your use-case involves referencing that data often.