logoalt Hacker News

trinix912 • 04/23/2025 • 2 replies • view on HN

While it doesn't excuse the bad habits, we do have to keep in mind C++98 (or whatever more ancient was used back then) didn't have the simple initializers we now take for granted. You couldn't just do 'Type myStruct = {};' to null-initialize it, you had to manually NULL all nested fields. God forbid you change the order of the variables in the struct if you're nesting them and forget to update it everywhere. It was just considerably more practical to do 'Type myStruct;' then set the fields when needed.

Replies

badc0ffee • 04/23/2025

You could always `bzero` or `memset` the entire struct to 0.

➕ show 1 reply
mrighele • 04/23/2025

I haven't been using C++ for a number of years but I think you could set the default values of fields even back then. Something like

    struct test {
        int my_int = 0;
        int* my_ptr = std::nullptr;
    };
Or is this something more recent ?

You cannot initialize them with a different value unless you also write a constructor, but it not the issue here (since you are supposed to read them from the file system)

➕ show 1 reply