logoalt Hacker News

azalemeth04/23/20253 repliesview on HN

That is an absolutely brilliant turn of events – strong evidence that the font in an anti-piracy campaign was itself arguably a copyright-infringing knock-off.

Someone should sue FACT for copyright infringement – and refuse to settle.


Replies

nailer04/23/2025

The song is also stolen: it’s an unauthorised interpolation of one man army by the prodigy:

https://open.spotify.com/track/65zwPZvsUCU55IpyWddFsK?si=bBf...

show 1 reply
charcircuit04/23/2025

You can't copyright a font.

show 6 replies
NoMoreNicksLeft04/23/2025

> was itself arguably a copyright-infringing knock-off.

In US law, there is no such thing. The shape of a glyph (or many) isn't even slightly copyrightable. This is settled law. Fonts (on computers) have a special status that makes them semi-copyrightable in that some jackass judge from the 1980s called them "computer programs" and so they have the same protection as software... but this won't protect against knockoffs.

show 3 replies