It sounds very intriguing indeed. However, the README makes some claims. Are there any benchmarks to support them?
> Built for performance we're currently 1000x faster than Neo4j, 100x faster than TigerGraph
Those were actual benchmarks that we run, we didn't get a chance to write them out properly before posting. I'll get on it now and notify by replying to this comment when they're on the readme :)
Those were actual benchmarks that we run, we didn't get a chance to write them out properly before posting. I'll get on it now and notify by replying to this comment when they're on the readme :)