logoalt Hacker News

Havocyesterday at 4:03 PM3 repliesview on HN

Surprised they’re doing fixed leases. I would have thought a fixed base with a layer of spot priced VMs for peaks would be more efficient on cost


Replies

matt-pyesterday at 5:41 PM

Outside of the big clouds just buying a 1 Year lease (say) on a dedicated server is so cheap that you'd not be saving much vs spot instances and with spot instances you need code to manage this and you're introducing risk of slowdowns. Probably not worth the trade off.

To illustrate a 128GB ram 20 core server with a 10Gbps NIC and some small SSD storage is probably going to cost you <$2000 USD for a years rental.

show 1 reply
whizzteryesterday at 5:01 PM

If their businessmodel is high performance runners and cheap cost they probably don't want to budge on speed, and once renting something fast on the cloud the costs run up quickly enough that they are probably just better off with a few more machines that pay themselves over time.

tsaifuyesterday at 6:08 PM

yeah, like the others have said, the tradeoff isn't really worth it for us as a business. spot instances also generally come with low qos guarantees (since they tend to be interruptible). tbf there are on-demand alternatives with better guarantees though

another thing to note is that we bootstrap the hosts, and tune them a decent amount, to support certain high-performance features which takes time and makes control + fixed-term ownership desirable

[disclaimer: i work at blacksmith]