alt Hacker NewsIt's absolutely not discrimination and you're harming people by making such an absurd claim. Unreliable SMS delivery is not discrimination. This is how things end up on Fox News: "Is website security now discrimination?"
> I still think they have a good chance in court
Can you share the law you think was violated?
Replies
joquarky • yesterday at 7:42 PM
People love to eagerly advise litigation while remaining ignorant that a five-figure retainer is required to even get started on such a process.
And in the end, it's still a gamble that you may lose your case.
➕ show 1 reply
I'm not sure where "absolutely" comes from. I'm not an attorney to make assured statements, I can only guess.
I'm not talking about unreliable SMS delivery, I'm talking about banks not accepting other options like passkeys, software/hardware OTP keys which are more secure than SMS, thereby discriminating a whole class of people "living in the mountains".