> I love inaction as a default decision, but sometimes a decision is better than nothing. It reminds me of a groups when you can’t decide what to have for dinner – the best course of action isn’t to not eat at all, it’s to accept that everyone won’t be happy all the time, and take ownership of that unhappiness, if necessary, during the brief period of time when some people are upset.
Invalid comparison - eating one foodstuff or another affects a few people for a few hours. Significantly changing a popular language affects every single user of it forever.
But not changing has the same effect, also "forever" (and it also affects many non-users who could become users), so this is not a good argument for doing nothing