The supposed location of the burden of proof is really not the definitive guide to what you ought to believe that people online seem to think it is.
Can you elaborate? You've made a claim, but I really think there'd be value in continuing to what you actually mean.
What is the relevance of this generic statement to the discussion at hand?
Can you elaborate? You've made a claim, but I really think there'd be value in continuing to what you actually mean.