> then you have _that_ "littering" your code, instead of the syntax.
Yes, exactly. The unusual thing _should_ look unusual.
The unusual case does look unusual. == and != are visually very different.
I suspect the real problem here is that the parent commenter forgot (read: purposefully avoided) to write tests and is blaming the tools to drown his sorrow.
alt Hacker News
The unusual case does look unusual. == and != are visually very different.
I suspect the real problem here is that the parent commenter forgot (read: purposefully avoided) to write tests and is blaming the tools to drown his sorrow.