I think it might come to understanding what is "high quality" journal. Maybe such journal should be focused on much more proven and mature things. Where there would be lot less retractions as they have more mature and thus more proven information.

But I think problem is what is seen is "high quality" == "high impact". Which means that prestige and visibility is important things. Which likely lowers the threshold quite a lot as being first to publish possibly valid something is seen as important.