I mean the article claims that it's good - better than all other existing solutions, and hence why it's worth talking about in the first place.
It is _much_ better than all the other MCP servers I tried for the Mac so far (I've been doing one myself and know a lot about Mac automation, so I've benchmarked them, and none can do the kind of UI analysis I see in the demos).
It is _much_ better than all the other MCP servers I tried for the Mac so far (I've been doing one myself and know a lot about Mac automation, so I've benchmarked them, and none can do the kind of UI analysis I see in the demos).