logoalt Hacker News

jobigoud06/16/20252 repliesview on HN

I think a good amount of people pay for Youtube just to be able to listen to audio with the screen off, which is a completely artificial restriction they added to the free version.

Such a strange business model, making the free version below acceptable.


Replies

timewizard06/16/2025

> Such a strange business model, making the free version below acceptable.

That's because the core product is not anywhere near worth what they charge for it. The youtube interface is a nightmare for users and creators alike. I have very little controls over what I do and don't see, how I can filter or search for content, or how I can search for new content. History of both videos and comments are effectively non existent and impossible to reasonably search or archive.

It's not a service so much as it is a copyright clearinghouse.

If they had an actual experience with worthwhile features to offer then they wouldn't have to artificially degrade the free experience to convince you.

show 1 reply
ThatPlayer06/17/2025

It makes sense because YouTube's income is from being paid to deliver video ads. They can't fulfill that if the screen is off.

I believe they are rolling out audio ads.