>AI generated
What's your basis for this?
* lots of redundant prose
* vaguely incoherent temporal claims
* outdated coverage of Southwest
* formatting usage of bullet lists and random bolding smells a lot like an O3 "deep research" report
* unnamed author
“AI” the new “shill”
* lots of redundant prose
* vaguely incoherent temporal claims
* outdated coverage of Southwest
* formatting usage of bullet lists and random bolding smells a lot like an O3 "deep research" report
* unnamed author