logoalt Hacker News

Gigachadyesterday at 6:33 AM5 repliesview on HN

I’ve been trying this out. The biggest problem I’m experiencing is that your draws won’t be a perfect multiple of the grid size. Which means you are always going to be left with gaps on the side which are wasted space which could be up to 40mm.

There is kind of a solution to this where you can use non standard grid sizes to perfectly fit your draws, and there are generators which will create the baseplates and bins for you. But you lose the ability to use other people’s models.

Feel like it would have been better if they had picked a smaller grid size so the average wasted space would be smaller.


Replies

MarkColeyesterday at 7:15 AM

There is also the option to do half bins / half grid pattern at the edge. So you have the normal 42x42 grid pattern, then on one edge there are 21x42 sized boxes. There are a number of designs that support the half grid pattern. This would reduce your maximum lost space down to 20mm, and you would still have compatibility with the gridfinity system.

show 1 reply
LanceHyesterday at 2:05 PM

There is a fusion 360 plugin where you can customize all this. You won't be able to download everything out there for the default grid size, but you can make your own.

thebruce87myesterday at 7:56 AM

What does “draw” mean in this context?

show 1 reply
WillAdamsyesterday at 12:09 PM

I am actually beginning work on a fork which uses 21mm (half normal size) as the basis grid) --- a lot of my work (and attendant hardware) is smaller scale, so hoping that will work out well.

rcarmoyesterday at 6:45 AM

What I do is print custom bins to store long things on the side of the grid. Making it smaller or bigger would not have fixed anything.

show 1 reply