alt Hacker NewsIt’s an article whose discussion points are engineered. It’s not in good faith, and it’s a more frequent problem with articles in general.
It’s an article whose discussion points are engineered. It’s not in good faith, and it’s a more frequent problem with articles in general.
You still haven't really explained anything. What discussion points are engineered, and in what way are they engineered? What specifically do you have a problem with? If you don't explain your reasoning, why comment at all?