logoalt Hacker News

wombatpmyesterday at 9:54 PM3 repliesview on HN

I remember the DAT as a format killed by IP lawyers. The were many lawsuits seeking to prevent their sale in the US due to piracy concerns. The media was incredibly expensive. I only ever saw them in use for backup devices in small data centers. Even that went away once disks became cheaper.


Replies

nyrikkiyesterday at 10:03 PM

The whole "Home taping is killing music" was really "Industry sharks are killing music" in the era that DAT died anyway.

It did have a Streisand effect though.

kevin_thibedeauyesterday at 11:12 PM

It's use case was limited to people who needed to make digital recordings. For consumption, CDs are far more convenient.

dannyobrientoday at 12:12 AM

As the article mentions, DAT was mandated to be deliberately limited in its use by the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_Home_Recording_Act -- the first MP3 players were sued under the definition in the law, and barely escaped being banned. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recording_Industry_Ass%27n_of_.... )

The lesson learned by from this in the tech policy space in the 2000s was that legal tech mandates like this were really the worst form of regulation -- they both limited innovation, and didn't really work for the kind of market/business model protection that their advocates desired. I think we'll probably re-learn this after a long period of lax (or relaxed, depending on how you view it) regulation of tech.

show 1 reply