logoalt Hacker News

PeeMcGeelast Tuesday at 5:26 AM3 repliesview on HN

> That does not mean there isn't an AI system that can do X.

You are holding the burden of proof here...


Replies

ameliuslast Tuesday at 7:19 AM

No, Carmack holds the burden of proof because he started the argument. His incapable program does not prove anything.

Maybe this is formulated a bit harshly, but let us respect the logic here.

jeffreygoestolast Tuesday at 6:45 AM

One of my supervisors used to say: "Don't tell me it's impossible, tell me _you_ could not do it." A true c_nt move that ends every discussion.

show 1 reply
lucumolast Tuesday at 6:26 AM

No. Pointing out a flaw in an argument doesn't require proving the opposite.