logoalt Hacker News

nottorplast Friday at 9:30 AM5 repliesview on HN

Incidentally, why aren't there more part time positions?

Probably because said leadership would then be unable to keep their employees in meetings since they're supposed to do some actual work once in a while.


Replies

Lyngbakrlast Friday at 10:27 AM

At the C-suite level, I'm noticing more "fractional" positions, which — as far as I can tell — is a fancier way of saying part time. (This may be the Baader–Meinhof phenomenon at work, though.)

aleph_minus_onelast Friday at 9:56 AM

> Incidentally, why aren't there more part time positions?

It is obviously easier to manage a small group of people who work full-time than a larger group of people who work part-time. So, if there does not exist a strong wish for part-time positions from the employees, few will be created.

Also, a lot of employees are there "for the money". So getting paid much worse for a part-time position is considered to be the worse deal by many employees.

account42last Friday at 11:07 AM

Maybe there are more than you think? Some companies are willing to do reduced time even if it isn't explicitly listed on the offer.

asdf6969last Friday at 7:52 PM

There aren’t formal part time positions but there’s a lot of jobs that only occupy half your full time and don’t ask questions when you disappear for a few hours

ozimlast Friday at 10:35 AM

Go ask wait staff or warehouse workers how much they like their part time jobs.

show 1 reply