logoalt Hacker News

ramblermanyesterday at 6:32 AM2 repliesview on HN

Love the concept but “the moat of low status” is a poor name.

It implies a defensive structure. I.e the advantage I get out of low status.

Op even refers to the concept of moats as used in business, but clumsily hand waves the concept to fit her own.

The cage of low status would be more apt


Replies

pavement_sortyesterday at 11:45 PM

>It implies a defensive structure. I.e the advantage I get out of low status.

OP is using the term moat in the standard way, actually. Something you have to cross to get to the reward (skill at a particular thing), that most people won't pay the cost for (being temporarily bad at something and low status). It stops most people from even trying to compete.

Quote from the article:

"It’s called a moat because it’s an effective bar to getting where you’re trying to go, and operates much like a moat in the business sense — as a barrier to entry that keeps people on the inside (who are already good at something) safe from competition from the horde of people on the outside (who could be)."

derektankyesterday at 3:03 PM

Being low status can be psychologically protective in some ways. One can opt into being low status as a defense mechanism, "I'm afraid of genuine failure, but by choosing artificial failure from the start, I can avoid the emotional pain of genuine failure."