logoalt Hacker News

tyleolast Saturday at 11:54 PM2 repliesview on HN

“Worst possible person” isn’t accurate but “worst person ever in the role” probably is.


Replies

tombertlast Saturday at 11:56 PM

Within some degree of reason I think it still holds. Yes, if you actively appointed a doomsday cult leader who wants to exterminate the human race, then that would be worse, but that kind of feels like a contrived example.

Within the scope of "people who would realistically actually be appointed", he is the absolute worst case scenario.

show 1 reply
rsynnottyesterday at 12:23 PM

It's... hard to imagine someone worse, in this particular case. Possibly someone who was actively malicious (vs just delusionally insane, which seems to be the case here)?