https://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/10271725...
The date on it is 2016. 33 years later. I don't find that particularly convincing.
BTW, I've read a lot of computer histories, and I often find errors in them. This is why professional historians try to use contemporary sources as much as possible.
alt Hacker News
The date on it is 2016. 33 years later. I don't find that particularly convincing.
BTW, I've read a lot of computer histories, and I often find errors in them. This is why professional historians try to use contemporary sources as much as possible.