logoalt Hacker News

danelski07/31/20253 repliesview on HN

But independent browsers need this metric. Good luck convincing website owners to test against your non-chromium browser with 0.3% market share.


Replies

drdaeman07/31/2025

I'm not tracking what's currently going on with the underwater portion of frontend iceberg. Are things still like it was in late '00s and early '10s, where browsers still had plenty of their unique implementation quirks and non-standard features, and plenty of sites were relying on those?

Back in the day, it was not entirely unheard of having two significantly different frontend implementations - one for IE, another for Netscape, with quite unhealthy amounts of parser hacks to hide code from the browsers.

Possibly naively, but I think it's not that bad nowadays? (At least it wasn't so in late '10s.) Some things are Chrome-only, or Apple-only, but I rarely see "not supported in your browser" - the majority of features is generally standards compliant, and all those newcomer engine problems (like in the article) are mostly because there's a lot to implement.

show 1 reply
rollcat07/31/2025

Twitch randomly blocks Chromium.

(They don't even block the streams, only logins. I can watch, but not spend money. Perfectly reasonable.)

show 1 reply
WD-4207/31/2025

Okay but if everyone building the websites are using the browser with 0.3% market share it won't matter.

show 1 reply