logoalt Hacker News

renewiltord07/31/20251 replyview on HN

This is, in practice, true which has led to the other complaint common on tech forums (including HN) about paywalls. As the WSJ and NYT will tell you: if you request some URL, they can respond over the wire with what they want. Paywalls are the future. In some sense, I am grateful I was born in the era of free Internet. In my childhood, without a credit card I was able to access the Internet in its full form. But today's kids will have to use social media on apps because the websites will paywall their stuff against user agents that don't give them revenue.


Replies

sejje07/31/2025

They're welcome to send that IMO. And sites are welcome to try to detect and ban agents (formerly: "bots").

As long as it's not wrong/immoral/illegal for me to access your site with any method/browser/reader/agent, and do what I want with your response. Then I think it's okay to send a response like "screw you, humans only"

Paywalls suck, but the suck doesn't come from the NYT exercising their freedom to send whatever response they choose.

show 1 reply