logoalt Hacker News

onli08/09/20251 replyview on HN

> Not everybody upgrades RAM, and those people deserve computers too.

No. It's end of the line with consumerism and we either start repairing and recycling or we die. Framework catered to people who agree with that, and this product is not in line.

I have no idea why you would not upgrade your memory, I have done so in all PCs I ever owned and all laptops, and it's a very common (and cheap) upgrade. It reduces waste because people can then use their system longer, which means less garbage over the lifetime of a person. And as was already commented, it is not only about upgrades, but also about repairs. Ram breaks rather often.


Replies

epistasis08/09/2025

I have had the system for eight years and at no point would upgrading RAM have increased performance.

Upgrading the RAM would have created more waste than properly sizing the RAM to COU proportion from the beginning.

It is very odd to encounter someone who has such a narrow view of computing that they cannot imagine someone not upgrading their RAM.

I have not once, literally not once have RAM break either. I have been part of the management of clusters of hundreds of compute nodes, that would occasionally each have their failures, but not once was RAM the cause of failure. I'm fairly shocked to hear that anybody's RAM has failed, honestly, unless it's been overlocked or something else.

show 2 replies