>He was also a minor when the convicted offences took place.
False. Stop carrying water for grooming sexual predators:
After she reported her brother’s abuse to police in 2010, naval investigators questioned Jeremy, who was stationed overseas. He admitted everything.
In a statement to naval lawyers, Jeremy detailed the abuse of his sisters and admitted to inappropriately touching his third sister and two other non-family members when he was a teenager.
He started abusing children when he was 11, and continued into his teenage years.https://wng.org/articles/the-high-cost-of-negligence-1617309...
> >He was also a minor when the convicted offences took place.
> False. Stop carrying water for grooming sexual predators:
A) Nobody is "carrying water" for anything, and B) OK, loking forward to your demonstrating how it is false.
what, is him being stationed overseas supposed to prove anything about how old he was when he did whatever he did? It doesn't. We don't know if he did it the same day she reported it, or many years before. Could have been years before... When he was a minor.> He started abusing children when he was 11, and continued into his teenage years.
Ah. So now you're saying it's TRUE that he was a minor when the convicted offences took place, not "False".
You're really not very good at arguing your point, are you? Maybe you shouldn't try to argue online until you've got a little better at building a coherent argument.