> Learning how to use LLMs in a coding workflow is trivial. There is no learning curve. You can safely ignore them if they don’t fit your workflows at the moment.

I'm sprry, but I disagree with this claim. That is not my experience, nor many others. It's true that you can make them do something without learning anything. However, it takes time to learn what they are good amd bad at, what information they need, and what nonsense they'll do without express guidance. It also takes time to know what to look for when reviewing results.

I also find that they work fine for languages without static types. You need need tests, yes, but you need them anyway.