logoalt Hacker News

throwaway4496last Monday at 1:02 AM7 repliesview on HN

[flagged]


Replies

noah_buddylast Monday at 2:24 AM

Don’t you find it somewhat ironic that you created a throwaway to preserve your privacy in stating this opinion against privacy in browsing?

I agree with you that people should avoid using it, but I agree that the state should but out here. If you want to enforce this sort of thing, make it at the parental level.

tamimiolast Monday at 2:06 AM

You would be naive to think this is after porn, it’s just for public consumption and justification, the whole idea is more control and surveillance, once the infrastructure is there, the laws and resources too, it will be just some quick small amendment to expand it further for something else, that’s how always it works, one step at a time, boil the frog slowly.

show 1 reply
Krssstlast Monday at 2:44 AM

Souls don't exist so it's fine I guess.

What's so bad about it? Production if often unethical and that's a problem but is there more? (and if production was the problem they wouldn't just put an age limit)

Is this about religion beliefs?

mathiaspointlast Monday at 1:03 AM

Go after the people producing it. Stop bothering service and infrastructure providers. Doing that is either lazy or malicious.

show 2 replies
stephen_glast Monday at 1:55 AM

Until more and more things are deemed as requiring age verification and full ID to access. Always starts with the things that enough people are happy to ban to get people like you onboard, then encroaches until there is full mass surveillance.

We're already seeing the massive over-blocking and encroachment starting, just weeks into the age blocking in UK's Online Safety law coming into effect.

show 1 reply
stackedinserterlast Monday at 1:55 AM

Obviously throaway account.

show 2 replies
snozollilast Monday at 1:12 AM

Nothing of value is at risk with this law.

Privacy is of no value because you decided that porn is bad for me?

show 2 replies