logoalt Hacker News

fc417fc802last Monday at 5:16 AM2 repliesview on HN

Being temporary and being authoritarian are entirely orthogonal. In general I would imagine that cultures willing to accept temporary authoritarianism for the "right reasons" are more prone to falling to dictators.


Replies

Krssstlast Monday at 5:43 AM

Most democraties have provisions for times of exceptional needs and counterpowers against that. Of course that's a weakness but a weakness that's judged better than mass deaths or complete fall of the country.

Those have to be limited in time and regularly subjected to control by democratically-elected institutions (actually vote to see if extended or not).

show 1 reply
stephen_glast Monday at 6:16 AM

It's a silly hypothetical though - the argument that some emergency measures during an international pandemic emergency are authoritarianism would only make sense if we were all still subject to the measures (like stay at home orders).

The problem for your argument is that the temporary emergency measures turned out to actually be temporary. Authoritarian regimes use emergencies (often fake ones) to entrench long-term change, this was a real emergency that had a temporary response...

show 1 reply