> I’m no AI expert, but the fact that you have “prompt engineers” [...] gives me pause.
Why? A bunch of human workers can get a lot more done with a capable leader who helps prompt them in the right direction and corrects oversights etc.
And overall, prompt engineering seems like exactly the kind of skill AI will be able to develop by itself. You already have a bit like this happening: when you ask Gemini to create a picture for you, then the language part of Gemini will take your request and engineer a prompt for the picture part of Gemini.
This is the goalpost flip which happens in AI conversations. If goalpost is even the right term, conversation switch?
Theres 2 AI conversations on HN occurring simultaneously.
Convo A: Is it actually reasoning? does it have a world model? etc..
Convo B: Is it good enough right now? (for X, Y, or Z workflow)