I suppose this is the move if you're looking to foreclose all possible competing usages. Kudos for using correct terminology as it is no longer Open Source.
However, I still believe AGPL is a better alternative in most cases and functionally prevents large enterprises from touching your code due to typical internal policies.
Shame on the people who recommend the AGPL to effectively be an OSI-approved source-available license.
This is a grievance against the spirit of open source.