alt Hacker NewsThey care that other people can sell the software, not that other people can use the software, which is why the license they use makes that distinction.
They care that other people can sell the software, not that other people can use the software, which is why the license they use makes that distinction.
This is a confusing claim. Are you saying the chosen license (<https://github.com/HermanMartinus/bearblog/blob/998e87263248...>) makes the software free to use to offer (e.g. gratis) "hosted or managed service[s]" so long as one does not sell the services? This is trivially confirmed not to be true. It prohibits all use of the software to provide services, not just a prohibition on selling them.