alt Hacker NewsAmazon and Apple have never had fundamental research groups. Even before LLMs, the top big-tech fundamental labs were FAIR, Google Research and MSR.
It has never been in Amazon or Apple's DNA to chase a product that doesn't have clear revenue outcomes (as long as adoption lands). AI is no different.
IMO, it's the right decision for Amazon and wrong decision for Apple.
Replies
stingraycharles • today at 12:40 AM
Didn’t Amazon invest a total of $8 billion in Anthropic? Seems like a much better choice than trying to do things in-house.
Apple, on the other hand, hasn’t even invested in any of the players.
➕ show 2 replies
bionhoward • today at 1:33 AM
What about Amazon’s work in formal verification research and Apple’s machine learning research?
They got burned by over-promising Apple Intelligence and then embarking on a so-far failed, rudderless journey to land features regular people actually gave a shit about. I’m no expert, but I reckon the exact right move is concentrating on their actual deliverable products and features and letting everyone else blow their cash on a maybe months-long moat for dubiously useful advances in categories most of their customers wish everyone would stop talking about.